Speech By Diogenis D. Valavanidis
president of the" Center for the protection of Christian identity " in Belgrade,
held at the International Conference in Belgrade, 26.03.2025. "the patriarch of Constantinople as an instrument of politics: the destructive activity of Patriarch Bartholomew I".
Ladies and gentlemen,
In today's changing social and political circumstances on the geopolitical plane, when open war is waged against our Savior Jesus Christ; when Patriarch Bartholomew I of Constantinople does everything to impose himself as eastern pope; when Pope Francis 13. May 2023. during his visit to France, he publicly receives Satanic symbols by the president of Ukraine Zelensky, i.e. the icon of the mother of God with the darkened image of Jesus Christ; when humanity is on the brink of decline and humanity is in deep moral and spiritual decline, we warn and warnto defend the essence and meaning of our existence in this world today.
If we analyze this moment, we come to the conclusion that Cthe Patriarchate of Arriba and its patriarch, canonos-archpriest Bartholomew I, at this time, they represent the greatest danger to the survival of the Orthodox Church. Apparently that the world centers of power estimated that the main link in the Orthodox Church was the Patriarch Bartholomew I of Constantinople, so that they directed all activities through him, assessing that in this way they would more successfully perform the disintegration, i.e. the disintegration of the Orthodox Church as a whole.
As you know, in the first place Patriarch Bartholomew Of Constantinople I he invaded the field of jurisdiction of the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate, and at the same time declared the autocephalous schism, the so-called. The Orthodox Church of Ukraine. Such a procedure it was one of the reasons, which ignited the spark of conflict in Ukraine, and triggered a wave of State terror by the Ukrainian security forces against members of the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church (UPC).
It is almost impossible to imagine that the patriarch of Constantinople decided on such a schismatic step that caused a huge earthquake in the entire Orthodox church without being richly "rewarded"for it. For this reason, the question was constantly floating in the air, who could be the person who created and activated it?.
First of all, we are talking about the U.S. government and CIA which used the Patriarchate of Constantinople and its influence in the Orthodox world to achieve its geopolitical and geostrategic goals. We also know that from the arms of this organization came the "doctrine of fighting the East", which was created by the first civilian director of the CIA, Allen Dulles.
However, recently there has been an ambition to take the initiative from British intelligence service MI6. We received confirmation of this when the news of the recent (late January 2025) came. G) visits of delegations of the All-Ukrainian Union of churches and religious organizations to London, where they had meetings with representatives of Parliament, the British Foreign Office, members of Chatham House, as well as special representative of the Prime Minister of Great Britain on religious freedom, David Smith.
Such British tendencies became more visible, especially after the arrival of Donald Trump at the head of the US administration, who immediately after taking office issued an executive order to open a special Office of the White House for faiths, with the aim of protecting vulnerable Christian communities with his activities.
The "Center for the protection of Christian identity" from Belgrade reacted immediately, and already 22. February and 24. March 2025. Mr. sent letters to the White House Office of the faith, pointing to the most acute problems of the Orthodox Church, namely: the blatant killings of Orthodox believers, mainly of the Greek people in Syria, of which there are about 500,000, and which are under the jurisdiction of the Patriarchate of Antioch, as well as the State terror that Ukrainian officials are carrying out against clergy and faithful of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate (UPC MP).
In addition to American and British intelligence, we also observe the presence of the so-called. World governments in the shadow, fully illuminated by one of the most prominent professors of the Faculty of law in Belgrade, Professor Smilja Avramov, PhD, in her book "trilateral", in which she explained that this is a private organization, which was founded with the aim of fostering close relations between the United States, Europe and Japan. It was formed on the initiative of David Rockefeller, that is, on the idea of Zbigniew Brzezinski.
From the testimony of Professor Smilja Avramov, we learned that 164 national branches of the trilateral have been established so far within this organization. The last was established in Serbia, after Slovenia and Croatia. In fact, no ideological institution, which aimed to unite humanity as a single whole, has so far failed. When it was seen that no success had been achieved with the model of capitalism or socialism, Brzezinski and a group of theorists came up with the idea of forming a transnational organization that would assume the role of a World Government. The initial idea was to bring together a transnational elite in a limited format and thus form a transnational club, which would expand over time.
Professor Smilja Avramov is at the round table organized by the movement for Serbia, on the occasion of the meeting of the European group of the Trilateral Commission in Belgrade 31. October to 2. November 2014. in 1976, the United States, the Vatican and Germany were first identified. they concluded a secret agreement in 11 points, one of which referred to the "total destruction of Orthodoxy". The participants of the secret agreement were crystal clear, when they said that Orthodoxy must be removed from World Communications as a religion, because it is the only homogenizing element of Orthodox countries that has political dimensions, which means that globalization with Orthodoxy would be very difficult to succeed.. In other words, orthodoxy and Orthodox peoples are the only true opponents of globalism. Other nations have no alternative to globalization, so neither China nor the countries of the Muslim world are able to offer a new world moral project.
Recognizing the danger that loomed over the Orthodox Church as a whole, the "Center for the protection of Christian identity" from Belgrade 6. November 2024. in a public appeal, he addressed the patriarch of Jerusalem and all of Palestine, and The Guardian of the Tomb of the Lord Jesus Christ, Theophilos IIIfor the salvation of the entire Orthodox Church, with the proposal to convene a Pan-Orthodox Council, in which all the Primates of the Orthodox churches would participate, in Amman (Jordan), which the patriarch of Jerusalem himself had previously done, March 2020. years. The appeal stated, among other things, that today in the Orthodox Church de de facto, although not and de jure, we have a schism that manifests itself through the inability to serve among the Orthodox because of the uncanonical actions of one Patriarch, Bartholomew of Constantinople I.
Bearing in mind that Patriarch Bartholomew I of Constantinople had violated numerous church canons, the height of the dishonor was when he became scandalously involved in politics on the 22nd. June 2024. in Switzerland, in Bjurgenstock, where he signed a declaration of support for Kiev.
This act, Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople I, as well as Serbian Patriarch Porfirije, which is 2023. he was a member of the state institution of the regulatory body for control of electronic media (rem), they violated many church rules. of which, for example,:
– 6. The Apostolic rule, which in the law of St. Sava, reads: "The holy person, taking upon himself worldly affairs-is unconscious.".
– 81. The Apostolic rule: "A bishop who engages in the management of Social Affairs is not a bishop.".
Interpretation"He who manages social affairs and does not focus on the needs of the church, whether Bishop or Presbyter or deacon – either to stop doing so, or, if he does not submit, to extricate himself. For according to the word of the Lord, a servant cannot serve two Masters.“
When it comes to the Serbian Patriarch Porfirije, except that a canon, he is also a pervert.. In other words, patriarch Porfirije grossly violated the Episcopal oath he took, in which he writes, among other things, that:
"I will not interfere in world affairs."
"I promise not to do anything under compulsion, even if forced by the rulers or by a multitude of people, even if they threaten me with death by demanding that I do something contrary to the divine commandments and the sacred rules of the Church of Christ."
Therefore, we believe that all the uncanonical and perjury actions of the two listed as well as other church dignitaries would be much clearer and more understandable to the public if the Secret Service archives were opened, just as President Donald Trump did, with the executive order to open the secret files concerning the assassination of former President John Fitzgerald.Kennedy.
In conclusion, I would like to emphasize that despite the fact that the Patriarchate of Constantinople needs and must remain in Constantinople, because by its removal the last tombstone was placed on the Hellenic-Roman-Byzantine Empire, despite this, the large number of difficult and fateful non-canonical decisions of Patriarch Bartholomew I of Constantinople are so frightening that even if he eventually withdrew from the patriarchal throne, it would not justify him.
Source: Center for Geostrategic Studies
27. March 2025.