author-avatar

About Центар за геостратешке студије

Center for geostrategic studies is a non-governmental and non-profit association, founded in Belgrade at the founding assembly held on 28.02.2014. in accordance with the provisions of art.11. and 12. Law on associations ("Official Gazette of Rs", no.51/09). for an indefinite period of time, in order to achieve the goals in the field of scientific research of geostrategic relations and preparation of strategic documents, analysis and research. The association develops and supports projects and activities aimed at the state and national interests of Serbia, has the status of a legal entity and is registered in the register in accordance with the law. The mission of the Center for geostrategic studies is: "we are building the future, because Serbia deserves it: the values we represent are established through our history, culture and tradition. We believe that without the past there is no future. For this reason, in order to build the future, we must know our past and cherish our traditions. True values are always grounded, and the future cannot be built in a good direction without that foundation. In a time of disruptive geopolitical change, it is crucial to make wise choices and make the right decisions. Let go of all imposed and distorted ideas and artificial urges. We firmly believe that Serbia has enough quality and potential to determine its own future, regardless of threats and limitations. We are committed to the Serbian position and the right to decide our own future, bearing in mind the fact that historically there have been many challenges, threats and dangers that we have overcome. “ Vision: the Center for geostrategic studies aspires to become one of the world's leading organizations in the field of geopolitics. He also wants to become a local brand. We will try to interest the public in Serbia in international topics and gather all those interested in protecting state and national interests, strengthening sovereignty, preserving territorial integrity, preserving traditional values, strengthening institutions and the rule of law. We will act in the direction of finding like-minded people, both in the domestic and in the world public. We will focus on regional cooperation and networking of related NGOs, both at the regional and international level. We will launch projects at the international level to support the repositioning of Serbia and the preservation of territorial integrity. In cooperation with media houses, we will implement projects that are focused on these goals. We will organize education of interested public through conferences, round tables and seminars. We will try to find a model for the development of the organization that would enable the financing of the activities of the Center. Build a future together: If you are interested in cooperating with us, or to help the work of the Center for geostrategic studies, please contact us by e-mail: center@geostrategy.rs

Dragana Trifkovic: Double Erdogan

Dragana Trifkovic, Director General of the Center for geostrategic studies

A few days ago, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan said that Turkey is in favor of seeking diplomatic ways to resolve the conflict in Ukraine. We will remember that they are in Turkey in spring 2022. negotiations between Moscow and Kiev were organized in 2019, which ended in failure thanks to London, after the then British prime minister Boris Johnson urged Kiev not to sign anything with the Russian Federation and to keep fighting. Although Western countries, like Turkey, are in favor of achieving peace in Ukraine, it is clear that their actions are fundamentally different from rhetoric. Minsk agreements on the cessation of hostilities in Ukraine (2014-2015) year.), It served the West only to buy time to further strengthen Ukraine's armed forces. This was confirmed by the former chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel, which clearly says that when the West "Orwellian" talks about peace, it is actually waging war ("war is peace, freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is power" by George Orwell in 1984). In this connection, the collective West has lost any credibility to speak and negotiate peace as a party that encourages conflict and does not respect international law. But is Turkey different from the West on this issue and can Turkey be trusted?

Continue reading

Milankovic's time: past, present and future

У Свечаној сали Грађевинског факултета у Београду, 28. маја је одржан скуп под називом „Време Миланковића: прошлост, садашњост и будућност“ поводом обележавања 145. годишњице рођења једног од највећих српских научника двадесетог века, Милутина Миланковића. Свечани скуп је окупио је бројне угледне званице, професоре, студенте и поштоваоце лика и дела овог великана.

Continue reading

National movement "Fatherland": Serbdom in Lear and collective betrayal

Information Service of the people's movement of Serbs from Kosovo and Metohija "Fatherland"

The national movement of Serbs from Kosovo and Metohija "Fatherland" strongly condemns the adoption of the resolution on Srebrenica in the United Nations, which effectively declares the entire Serbian people to be genecid. This resolution is of a more political character and aims to unitarize Bosnia and Herzegovina, calling into question the competences of Republika Srpska with the intention of turning it into a community of Serb municipalities.

Continue reading

Who (really) was Dr. Ibrahim Rugova (1944−2006. Mr.)?

Written by: Dr Vladislav B. Sotirović

Current 2024. Mr. Marks the 80th anniversary of the birth of Dr. Ibrahim Rugova, one of the key shptar politicians who in 1990.- after the break-up of the SFRY, they worked wholeheartedly but secretly to break the territorial integrity of Serbia and, unfortunately, with the direct help of the West in this, they succeeded. Who (really) was Dr. Ibrahim Rugova? 

Continue reading

Bulgarian priests and believers against the co-ordination of their bishops with Ukrainian schismatics

Five bishops of the Bulgarian Orthodox church (three metropolitans and two bishops) for the first time Su 19. Maya 2024. he servedand with representatives of the schismatic "Orthodox Church of Ukraine", although Saint sthe U.S. never made a decision about possible stupAnia in communion with schismaticsMa.

Do sservicea it came at a time when Bthe Hungarian church has no PAtriarchbecause it is in Marti PAtriarch neophyte. Metropolitan Nicholas of Plovdiv, who served with the sectarians PCUhe is one of the leading names in the upcoming elections for patriarch, for whosezbor Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople showed great interest.

Continue reading

Paul Craig Roberts: why did democracy fail in the United States?

Written By Paul Craig Roberts

Throughout my life, what I have noticed is that Republicans define patriotism mainly in terms of opposing foreign enemies. This was most pronounced during the long cold war with the Soviet Union. It is certainly true that we should be on guard against foreign enemies, but we must not be so on guard to create enemies where there are none or refuse to defuse tensions and replace hostile relations with cooperative ones as President John F. Kennedy once did. Kennedy said he intended to do so before he was assassinated and as President Trump intended to do so before the Russia accusation prevented him.

Continue reading

Eastern Front 2.0: What is the difference between the eastern front of World War II and the present

Written By: Draga Ivić

On some portals we can see a separate topic called ”Eastern Front”, so we can often meet this syntax in the news.

Why did their editors choose to name the area where everything is taking place (as the Russians officially call it and represent it in the Security Council), i.e. occupation, aggression, etc., as the attacked side and its allies call it?

Continue reading

Dragana Trifkovic: resolution on Srebrenica and the old jails of the Balkans

The adoption of the resolution on" genocide " in Srebrenica primarily speaks of the abuse of international institutions by Western power centers that impose their political agendas in this way.

The resolution proposed by Germany is biased, non-objective and politicized. As in the days of Nazi Germany, this state is subject to and favorable to Anglo-American strategic agendas of creating conflict. The adopted resolution is a threat to peace and security and it opened the Pandora's box, given that numerous genocides committed by Western countries such as the United Kingdom, the United States, France, Germany, Belgium and others have never been officially characterized as such. There are millions of victims worldwide on the African, American, Euro-Asian, Australian continent.

Continue reading

The Conflict in Ukraine: How Do Matters Stand?

By Paul Craig Roberts

I have tried to provide accurate analysis of the conflict in Ukraine. This is not a simple task as there is little publicly available information about how the Kremlin sees the widening of the conflict. France has sent troops. The US Secretary of Defense said that eventually NATO troops will be deployed to Ukraine, and European governments are preparing for war with Russia in 4 or 5 years.

Putin’s original goals were the liberation of the Donbas region, and denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine. How denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine were to be accomplished without the conquest of Ukraine was never clear.

Continue reading