Dragana Trifkovic, Director General of the Center for geostrategic studies
Putin as a fortress of independent Russian statehood
Russian President Vladimir Putin has made it very clear that Russia will not follow either communist or liberal ideology, and will not copy western models, but will build its own path. Preserving traditions, strengthening the statehood and independence of the Russian Federation are the main foundations in the construction of this road. In his famous speech at the Munich Security Conference, 10. February 2007. "Russia is a country with more than a thousand years of history and has almost always enjoyed the privilege of pursuing an independent foreign policy." All these attitudes are key to building a future and an authentic Russian model.
The communist plot from the island: the British trail
Although the West continues to attach communism to Russia as the successor state of the USSR, seeking to present it as a state of "dark totalitarian ideology", the fact is that communism originated in London where the German philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, the founders of scientific communism, lived and worked. Their political program "manifesto of the Communist Party" was published for the first time in 1848. years in London. Did London not betray its allies both in Imperial Russia and in the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, in order for communism to prevail in these countries? Were they also"color revolutions"? From today's perspective, there is a lot of evidence to support this.
How the British invented communism(and blamed it on the Jews): The Untold Story of Karl Marx, Leon Trotsky, MI6 and the Russian Revolution
American author Richard Poe, film director and journalist of the New York Times, announced last year book "how the British invented communism (and blamed it on the Jews)-The Untold Story of Karl Marx, Leon Trotsky, MI6 and the Russian Revolution." While the Tsar was technically Britain's ally in World War I, the British elites feared that a victorious Russia would threaten Britain's global dominance. Bolshevism has provided a solution, destroying the once powerful empire and plunging Russia into chaos and civil war.“ This indicates the fact that the British very cunning came up with ideology, special operations and identified the contractors.
Anti-Jewish propaganda and Protocols of The Elders of Zion
Richard further states in the book: "in April 1919. in 2014, the British Foreign Office published a report entitled "White Paper on Russia no. 1: a collection of reports on Bolshevism in Russia", also known as "the Blue Book of Bolshevik atrocity". It identified Jews as the driving force behind the assassination of the Tsar and the Bolshevik Revolution. The British press continued a coordinated, anti-Jewish propaganda campaign, largely based on The" Protocols of the elders of Zion", a document claiming to expose a Jewish conspiracy to enslave the world. Why did the British establishment so suddenly turn against the Jews? I believe this was done to provide a scapegoat – a Jewish scapegoat – that would distract from British complicity in the Russian Revolution.“
Other author Alan Sargent in his Studios "The matrix of protocols, George Shanks and The Protocols of the elders of Zion" (2021). he said the " Jewish danger "was" part of a sophisticated offensive propaganda designed and financed at the highest levels " of British power. Referring to Sarjant Poe, he concludes: "to be clear, Churchill was not mistaken in saying that Jews were disproportionately represented in the Bolshevik movement. They are. But that was only half the story. The other half is that the Bolsheviks themselves were pawns in the larger game. The British game. And Churchill knew it."
Lenin as a pioneer of the terror and destruction of orthodoxy
Russian historian Vitaly Darensky text under the title "Lenin is the creator of the system of concentration camps in Russia" he writes: "in the "immediate tasks of the Soviet government" in the spring of 1918. Lenin wrote: "We have conquered Russia, now we must govern Russia."He conceived of this administration as a preventive terror to intimidate the population. And he began to develop this action, perhaps the most terrible in the history of mankind, because from the very beginning it was directed against millions of different layers of the population.Lenin's most important goal was not only total extermination of all opponents of Bolshevism, but also total intimidation, creating an atmosphere of general fear.“
Last year it was published in Serbian. book the British author Christopher Cuterwood's "Churchill and Tito, Soe, Bleachley Park and support for Yugoslav communists in World War II", in which he justifies British policy in the Balkans, writes that by supporting Tito, partisans and communism (and betraying the army of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia) the British achieved their military goals. "One of Churchill's most controversial decisions in World War II was to shift support for the SOE (Special Operations Service) from the Chetniks, loyal to the exiled government, to Tito and the communist partisan movement in 1943. Consequently, after the war in Yugoslavia, a communist regime was established, which lasted until Tito's death in 1980, and then, until then, suppressed, nationalist aspirations culminated during the war conflicts of the 1990s on the territory of the former Yugoslavia," says the publisher "Official Gazette". It sounds like an excellent strategic basis for the realization of British interests in the Balkans, on which the doctrine of "conflict of civilizations" (Huntington) was built.
Strategically, communism had an equally devastating impact on both Russian and Serbian state and national interests (which is more than obvious today), but the most toxic result of the imposed ideology is the destruction of the Orthodox spirit, tradition, culture and morality. The emergence of renunciation of one's own identity was very thoroughly analyzed by Professor Milo Lompar in book "The spirit of self-denial."
Mummy: a documentary blow to cult and ideology
Although today's societies have far greater access to information thanks to the technological revolution, primarily the emergence of interests, there is still an unbreakable resistance to truth and a struggle to preserve the previous narratives and propaganda that has been an integral part of the hybrid war of the West for centuries. If we talk about the Western public, it is somewhat understandable because the opinions of the public opinion are in line with their interests. However, it is inconceivable that victims of special methods of warfare are also largely unwilling to accept the truth. Whether it is a deep indoctrination imposed by ideology, psychological inferiority or a conflict of (personal) interests is difficult to determine.
At the end of last month the Russian TV channel spas broadcast a documentary film "Mummy", in which Vladimir Ulyanov (better known as Vladimir Ilyich Lenin) is depicted without makeup on his face. Namely, the film opens up all important topics from Lenin's life path and connection to British intelligence, through his role in Russian society, especially the persecution of the clergy of the RPC, to death and mummification (embalming), and the construction of mausoleums, Masonic influences and the creation of a cult – a new deity. The website of TV spas says that this is"a story about Lenin, his occult roots, the spiritual meanings his creators brought into this building and about mausoleums in world history".
Photo: one of the theatrical premieres of the film "Mummy" in Bryansk, Russian Federation
Journalist Andrei Afanasyev shot the film in Egypt and Iraq where he explored ancient pyramids and Mesopotamian ziggurats by comparing them to the "mausoleum of death" in Red Square. The production of the film is excellent, and the special value of the film consists of used archival materials, videos from the early twentieth century and old photographs, as well as the use of modern technologies, artificial intelligence, with the help of which good visual effects and revived pages of history have been achieved. The authors of the film gathered powerful interviews of historians, clergy and public figures.
Leninists against spiritual conservationists
The film caused outrage among communists in Russia, but more interestingly, it also caused outrage among "Orthodox Leninists". One will ask, How is it possible to merge orthodoxy and Lenin?! This has the same meaning as if one were to present himself as an Orthodox believer who respects the devil. Absurd.
In an article titled "The emptiness of emptiness" (published on the KPRF website) protodeacon Vladimir Vasilik, a doctor of historical sciences, accused the film's creators of being "spiritually blind". In his "drawn-out" explanation of such a position, protodeacon Vasilik calls for the need to unite all those who are fighting in Donbass, including Lenin's admirers. But was it not the Russian Orthodox Church that was rehabilitated in the Great Patriotic War, because without it the unification of peoples and victory could not be achieved? If Lenin is a symbol of unity, why was the Church There necessary? Another thing, even those who went into a special military operation without God, found him in the first trench! It would be enough for the protodeacon to talk to the soldiers on the front line and understand that this is so. The residents of Donbass reacted to the destruction of the monument to Lenin by Ukrainian nationalists, not because they loved Lenin, but because for Ukrainian nationalists even Lenin, who made them a state, is not acceptable because he has ties to Russia.
As one of the great comments on the film polemic, I stand out comment "Lenin's destructive actions against Russia and the Russian people are well known and documented in hundreds of historical works, our cultural figures and politicians, including the president, have spoken critically (to put it mildly) about them. The malignity of Lenin's activity, his obsession with fomenting civil war, destroying opponents and even entire social groups and classes, the failed idea of state structure, the tragic consequences of which we are experiencing today, are more than obvious. They cannot be discussed. Therefore, unfounded accusations, distortions, manipulation and outright abuse are used,“ general Resetnikov wrote on his Telegram channel.
Photo: Film "Mummy", Andrei Afanasyev
Another critical review of the film" Mummy "was found on the website of the Russian national line titled" Mummy: enlightenment or provocation?"whose author is the editor-in-chief Anatoly Stepanov. In the text, he refers to the" doubtfulness " of historical data presented, which of course were not publicly available during communism, but the same data is presented today by numerous authors from the West. Certainly General Reshetnikov has undeniable authority to talk about it (his comments are included in The Documentary Film "Mummy"), if we take into account his career and the fact that many secret documents were available to him. Stepanov also claims that the film "Mummy" brings discord into Russian society but, I would say, it is a replacement of theses. It was Lenin (probably in accordance with the plans of London) who brought the seeds of discord into Russian society and contributed to the historical breakdown of unprecedented proportions, as well as the fratricidal war. For this reason, it is necessary to demystify his role to the end (which was obviously the goal of the author of the film), so that such a historical breakdown would never happen again.
Calling for the film not to be positively reviewed in countries where Lenin is respected (China, North Korea, Venezuela, Vietnam, Cuba, and African countries) also doesn't make too much sense. The policy of today's Russia is firmly directed towards the sovereignty of the state, respect for its own traditions and culture. In this regard, the destruction of the Russian tradition by Leninist ideology cannot be denied, in order to please Russia.
Sovereignty, truth and spiritual unification of Russia
In fact, Russia is given a much larger world role as a state that stands for truth and historical justice. Truth may irritate and provoke society, but did not Jesus Christ preach the truth and thus spiritually revive humanity? The Orthodox believer should never take the truth as a provocation. If we read between the lines the statement of Russian President Vladimir Putin, we can understand the following. Both communism and liberalism were imposed on Russia by the West. Therefore, it is essential for Russia to choose the Russian path for the future. Russian society can only unite the truth. However uncomfortable, bitter or provocative it may be, it is far more healing than the imposed lies and manipulations of those who want to destroy Russia. Exposing lies, including The Cult of Lenin, paves the way for the resurrection of Russia. Orthodox Russia. For this reason, the film "Mummy" is a great undertaking whose results will be seen in the future. I sincerely hope that this film will be shown on our premises as well, because we also have our "zigurats" and Masonic temples that we need to get rid of.
Historical facts-from the British roots of communism and anti – Jewish propaganda, to the terror under Lenin, to The "Mummy" - serve not only as a diagnosis of the past. They are advisory and prognostic tools that expose lies, root out authentic identity and ensure the spiritual unification of peoples.
The film "The Mummy" and the polemics it provoked, show the depth of this problem – which sends a strong message: if the cult of Lenin is not exposed, he will continue to divide society, as he has done for centuries. This is why the West defends its structures and narratives at all costs, and sees Orthodoxy as the greatest danger.
Truth is not just an analytical weapon — it is the cure, the foundation of renewal and spiritual rebirth. Without accepting uncomfortable truths, the narrative imposed on the West makes Russia's political and cultural efforts futile. It is necessary for Russian society to go through the mirror of the past, in order to spot and expose the untruths that are a prerequisite for a new spiritual and national rebirth. I recommend everyone to start by looking at the documentary. film "Mummy".
https://yandex.ru/video/preview/16549145883174132587
Source: Center for Geostrategic Studies
9. July 2025.
Instructions:
https://dzen.ru/a/ZHkFSV601jMUD6-N?ysclid=mcux2k9mo6831004081
https://zimamagazine.com/2020/04/lenin-i-london-ljubimye-mesta-vozhdya-mirovogo-proletariata/
https://canadianpatriot.org/2023/10/04/how-the-british-invented-communism-and-blamed-it-on-the-jews/
George Shanks & The Protocols of The Elders of Zion
https://kprf.ru/activity/culture/235792.html
https://ruskline.ru/news_rl/2025/06/30/film_mumiya_prosvewenie_ili_provokaciya
Српски језик 
English 
Русский 
العربية 
Español 
Português 
Deutsch 
Français 
Italiano 
简体中文