Economic expert of the Center for geostrategic studies: War and ideology or towards a healthy and contemporary concept of development
The overall World socio-historical development so far has shown us several legislatures, regardless of all the imbalances and turbulences that it was accompanied by. Even in our studies, despite the still vibrant post-Tito state, we were taught that the only true path to socio-historical development is evolution, not revolution, with all its problems and illogicities that it inevitably carries with it. Then, for a long time, in my master's thesis, I dealt with the second legality, i.e. the impossibility and unreality of skipping the stages of Social Development (slavery, feudalism, capitalism, socialism), which, as a rule, bring about an inevitable reversible process, i.e. a return to an earlier stage. I was based on, then very popular, developing countries, although later this legality was confirmed, not only in US, but also in developed, at that period, socialist countries. In parallel with this thesis, I was also preoccupied with the very challenging process of convergence, that is, the permeation, the stage of socio-historical development, which later proved to be another of the important legalities of this process. With the set, of course, we, the elderly, in the 1980s and 1990s, were able to follow the sad collapse of socialism at the time, which was most reflected in the economic field, and the glittering victory of Western capitalism, so we wondered where we went wrong, persistently following Marx.