地缘政治而政治

Daniel Kovalik: American people generally vote based on the personality of candidates and social issues

The interview was conducted by Dragana Trifkovic
 
How significant were the elections held in the USA for you personally? Did you vote in the elections?
 
In truth, I don’t think the elections are very significant.  On the big issues (eg, war, foreign policy and economics) the two parties are really not that very different.  I did not vote.  
 
What are the general expectations of American citizens from these elections?
 
I think the American people generally vote based on the personality of candidates and social issues.  I don’t think they have much expectation that the elections will change anything impacting their daily lives.
 
How do you evaluate the preliminary election results and exit polls? What can be concluded from them?
 
I think the take-away is that the American electorate is polarized along party lines, again mostly centered around social issues.
 
Were the elections in America well organized? Were there any problems in the election procedures?
 
This is a difficult question to answer as there is no centralized and uniform voting procedure for the country.  Every state has its own procedure, and so the process varies state-to-state.  There are always some problems with the procedure, including mass disenfranchisement. 
 
How transparent were the elections? Were interested citizens able to control the elections? Were there foreign observers?
 
The elections are not that transparent.  Most states have electronic voting procedures with little ability to verify.  In some cases, we will not know the results of the election for months.  There are no foreign observers.
 
The American president declared that there was no foreign interference in the elections in America. Earlier there were accusations that Russia interfered in the election process. How do you comment on that?
 
I think that claims of Russian interference was always a lie designed to give an alibi to the Democrats for losing to Trump and to vilify Russia so as to prime the population for conflict.
 
Why did former President Trump call for protests?
 
Trump called for protests because the Republicans did worse in the elections than expected, and he did not want to accept that.

 
After the election, can we expect changes in American politics or will everything remain as before?

 
Certainly after this round of elections, we can basically expect business as usual with little change. 
 
November 14, 2022.
 
*Daniel Kovalik is an American human rights, labor rights lawyer and peace activist. He teaches International Human Rights at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law.

 

提交人的头像

关于Центар за геостратешке студије

中心的地缘战略研究是一个非政府和非营利协会成立于贝尔格莱德成立大会举行28.02.2014. 按照规定的技术。11. 和12。 法律协会联合会("官方公报Rs",没有。51/09). 无限期的时间,以实现的目标在科学研究领域的地缘战略关系和准备的战略文件、分析和研究。 该协会开发和支持的项目和活动旨在国家和国家利益的塞尔维亚,有的状态的一个法律实体和在登记册登记在按照法律的规定。 特派团的中心的地缘战略研究是:"我们正在建设的未来,因为塞尔维亚应得的:价值观,我们表示的建立,通过我们的历史、文化和传统。 我们认为,如果没有过去,没有未来。 由于这个原因,为了建立未来,我们必须知道我们的过去,珍惜我们的传统。 真正的价值是直接地,且未来不能建立在良好的方向,而不是基础。 在一个时间破坏性的地缘政治变革,至关重要的是作出明智的选择和做出正确的决定。 让我们去的所有规定和扭曲思想和人工的敦促。 我们坚定地认为,塞尔维亚具有足够质量和潜力来确定自己的未来,无论威胁和限制。 我们致力于塞尔维亚的地位和权利决定我们自己的未来,同时铭记的事实,即从历史上看已经有很多的挑战、威胁和危险,我们必须克服的。 " 愿景:本中心的地缘战略的研究,希望成为一个世界领先组织在该领域的地缘政治。 他也希望成为当地的品牌。 我们将努力感兴趣的公众在塞尔维亚在国际议题和收集所有那些有兴趣在保护国家利益和国家利益,加强主权、维持领土完整,保护传统价值观、加强机构和法治。 我们将采取行动的方向寻找志同道合的人,无论是在国内和全世界的公众。 我们将重点放在区域合作和网络的相关非政府组织、在区域一级和国际一级。 我们将启动项目在国际一级支持重新定位的塞尔维亚和维护领土完整。 在合作与媒体的房子,我们将实施的项目都集中在这些目标。 我们将组织的教育感兴趣的公众通过会议、圆桌会议和研讨会。 我们将试图找到一个模型,用于发展的组织,使资助活动的中心。 建立一个共同的未来: 如果你有兴趣与我们合作,或帮助的工作中心的地缘战略研究中,请通过电子邮件: center@geostrategy.rs

发表回复

您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注