地缘政治而政治

Sarah Melis: There are currently various protests in the countries of Europe

 

Note: On February 5th, a protest is scheduled in Brussels

The Center for Geostrategic Studies spoke with protest organizers about the upcoming event

Sarah Melis, spokesperson for the organization „Together for Freedom“ from Belgium, is in the organizing committee of the protest scheduled for February 5 in Brussels.

The interview was conducted by Patrick Poppel, an expert from the Center for Geostrategic Studies from Austria

Photo: Sara Melis at a protest in Brussels

Why are you going to protest in Brussels?

Brussels is known as the capital of Europe, also the city where the European Union is housed. We want to show that Europe is its people, not just the institution that does not represent us anymore.

What are the specific reasons for your protest?

This is the most important question of all. Our first big topic is the impending introduction of a digital, programmable euro. We have seen in previous years how quickly governments are resorting to an exception that makes fundamental rights and freedoms conditional. The complete digitalization of money will entail enormous risks. It gives the government way too much power. A power that we cannot entrust to it, since the same politicians who have repeatedly told us proven lies, turned populations against each other and taken away our fundamental rights are still in charge today. A start to win back some of that trust would be to include cash as a means of payment in the constitution. In 1830 there was no question of digitalization of money, today it is necessary.

The second item on the agenda is inflation. Inflation is felt today by the middle class, workers, and the financially weaker people. We all give in, and that’s the fault of governments’ policies. This is the result of years of money creation. Europe has enough money when it comes to implementing certain agenda items such as energy transition and war in Ukraine. Social redistribution is not a priority. This is a debate that urgently needs to be conducted on the merits, and not left to lobby organizations, such as the WEF, that do not have the interests of the average citizen in mind.

A third point is to look at a „solution“ to the conflict in Ukraine, with peace in mind. Every casualty is one too many, but the American arms industry sets the agenda of the European Union. Von Der Leyen likes to talk war language, while diplomacy costs less money and especially fewer victims. Again, a Utopia of the elite was more important to her than what is actually the result.

To conclude, the European Union has not promoted European solidarity at all, it has only eroded it by serving only the agenda of lobbyists and not invoking common values and interests.

We want a change in current policy. The European Union has no democratic support for their policies. That has to change. Whether the European Union can still reform itself or has to disappear will depend on the course they take.

How do you see the current protest culture in other EU countries? How will this develop?

I think that as long as the policies will not change and as long as there won´t be a more democratic and transparent reorganization, and it´s maybe even naïve to think this could happen, more people will be changing their attitude towards the EU in a critical way and start joining the movement that has emerged these last years. At the moment we see big protests against the high energy prices, against the digital euro, against the vaccination damages and so much more in Western Europe. Although mainstream media ignores this completely, it also does give us hope. It is time to work together across the borders and take Europe from the elite, to give it back to its people.

What impact will protests have on election results? Will the opposition parties reach more sections of the population in the future?

We have seen the results in Italy, maybe we will see this in other countries as well. It will depend on circumstances in each country and on how ‘democratic’ the system still is. In our own country I believe the national parties in the federal government will reach a terrible result, because of these last years of policies although the mainstream media tries their best to stop this from happening.

Here they have a history that when they lose elections, they quickly go for a ´promotion´ in the European Union. Just like Charles Michel, Guy Verhofstadt, Karel De Gucht and many more did. These were politicians that were voted out by the people in previous elections. Then they easily go for a retirement home in Brussels.

In general, I think the most important thing is to start a movement among the people first, outside of the political system. This way we can open people’s eyes to the lies of the media and make the group of dissident voices grow. This is a battle we have to fight on many fronts if we want to win.

February 2, 2023

提交人的头像

关于Центар за геостратешке студије

中心的地缘战略研究是一个非政府和非营利协会成立于贝尔格莱德成立大会举行28.02.2014. 按照规定的技术。11. 和12。 法律协会联合会("官方公报Rs",没有。51/09). 无限期的时间,以实现的目标在科学研究领域的地缘战略关系和准备的战略文件、分析和研究。 该协会开发和支持的项目和活动旨在国家和国家利益的塞尔维亚,有的状态的一个法律实体和在登记册登记在按照法律的规定。 特派团的中心的地缘战略研究是:"我们正在建设的未来,因为塞尔维亚应得的:价值观,我们表示的建立,通过我们的历史、文化和传统。 我们认为,如果没有过去,没有未来。 由于这个原因,为了建立未来,我们必须知道我们的过去,珍惜我们的传统。 真正的价值是直接地,且未来不能建立在良好的方向,而不是基础。 在一个时间破坏性的地缘政治变革,至关重要的是作出明智的选择和做出正确的决定。 让我们去的所有规定和扭曲思想和人工的敦促。 我们坚定地认为,塞尔维亚具有足够质量和潜力来确定自己的未来,无论威胁和限制。 我们致力于塞尔维亚的地位和权利决定我们自己的未来,同时铭记的事实,即从历史上看已经有很多的挑战、威胁和危险,我们必须克服的。 " 愿景:本中心的地缘战略的研究,希望成为一个世界领先组织在该领域的地缘政治。 他也希望成为当地的品牌。 我们将努力感兴趣的公众在塞尔维亚在国际议题和收集所有那些有兴趣在保护国家利益和国家利益,加强主权、维持领土完整,保护传统价值观、加强机构和法治。 我们将采取行动的方向寻找志同道合的人,无论是在国内和全世界的公众。 我们将重点放在区域合作和网络的相关非政府组织、在区域一级和国际一级。 我们将启动项目在国际一级支持重新定位的塞尔维亚和维护领土完整。 在合作与媒体的房子,我们将实施的项目都集中在这些目标。 我们将组织的教育感兴趣的公众通过会议、圆桌会议和研讨会。 我们将试图找到一个模型,用于发展的组织,使资助活动的中心。 建立一个共同的未来: 如果你有兴趣与我们合作,或帮助的工作中心的地缘战略研究中,请通过电子邮件: center@geostrategy.rs

发表回复

您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注